Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 08:39:52 +1000 (EST) From: Colin Campbell <sgcccdc@citec.qld.gov.au> To: alexus <ml@db.nexgen.com> Cc: Steven Ames <steve@virtual-voodoo.com>, <Eric_Stanfield@kenokozie.com>, <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: another ip as alias on NIC doesn't work properly Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0108080836480.88546-100000@guru.citec.qld.gov.au> In-Reply-To: <002d01c11f89$efa67a10$0d00a8c0@alexus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, alexus wrote: > here is my routing table > > alexus@~# netstat -rn | grep -v dc0 > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default 66.92.98.1 UGSc 66 84980 fxp0 > 66.92.98/24 link#1 UC 5 0 fxp0 => > 66.92.98.1 0:10:67:0:8d:68 UHLW 64 0 fxp0 429 > 66.92.98.145 0:60:94:a5:cb:44 UHLW 1 88 lo0 > 66.92.98.148 0:30:48:21:78:a6 UHLW 0 2 fxp0 1023 > 66.92.98.149 0:30:48:21:3c:c9 UHLW 0 4652 fxp0 712 > 66.92.98.150 0:30:48:21:3c:c9 UHLW 0 512 fxp0 904 > 66.92.98.151/32 link#1 UC 0 0 fxp0 => > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 2 835 lo0 > alexus@~# > > > i still dont really know where 148,149,150 ip came from in this routing > table I answered that question in a previous email. Freebsd and, I think, many other BSD based systems, install a host route (the "H" in "UHLW") for any machine on the local lan that has connected to you. It also seems like .149 and .150 are the same NIC on that machine. Colin -- Colin Campbell Unix Support/Postmaster/Hostmaster CITEC +61 7 3006 4710 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.33.0108080836480.88546-100000>