Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:48:32 +0000
From:      David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To:        Matthew Emmerton <matt@gsicomp.on.ca.emmerton.org>
Cc:        Aaron Smith <aaron@mutex.org>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jon@csua.berkeley.edu, breadbox@muppetlabs.com
Subject:   Re: gzip's custom i386 asm should be disabled
Message-ID:  <20010321114832.A31809@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <017d01c0b1ab$df4be1b0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>; from matt@gsicomp.on.ca.emmerton.org on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 09:08:49PM -0500
References:  <20010320174630.B82004@gelatinous.com> <017d01c0b1ab$df4be1b0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 09:08:49PM -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> > Since I would imagine a large percentage of FreeBSD users run on i686
> > cores, it'd be great to get this pretty significant speed increase into
> our
> > tree.
> 
> I sure hope I'm not the only one with a "lab" of 4 FreeBSD machines that are
> all 486s or 586s.

You may find that the 686 assembly is as fast on a 386/486/586 as
the old assembly is. Maybe you could test it and let the list know?

	David.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010321114832.A31809>