Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 20:28:58 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Barney Wolff <barney@tp.databus.com>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Skinny (SCCP) protocol gateway for libalias Message-ID: <20020630202858.B10041@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <1025487696.48597.43.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>; from marcus@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 09:41:36PM -0400 References: <1025480857.48597.33.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20020630204452.A56736@tp.databus.com> <1025485730.48597.35.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20020630213704.A57193@tp.databus.com> <1025487696.48597.43.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 09:41:36PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Sun, 2002-06-30 at 21:37, Barney Wolff wrote: > > I knew I should have explained. :) > > > > What I fear is volatility, with an undocumented proprietary protocol. > > And suppose Cisco abandons it for something completely different - > > when would it be aged out? > > You bring up a good point. Volatility is something I didn't consider. > Thanks. IMO you shouldn't consider it. Cisco will probably support this protocol for years. Even if they "abandon" it, it will still be supported because there are already sites with thousands of phone that aren't going to upgrade on a whim. I believe it should go in. If at some point in the future it is actually gone from real use, then it can be removed. -- Brooks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020630202858.B10041>