Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:10:38 +0100 From: Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> To: Matthias Muthmann <mmuthmann@gmx.net> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with X.. Message-ID: <200503022010.39072.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <1109789237.19508.3.camel@localhost> References: <200502240244.03104.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <200503021050.35620.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <1109789237.19508.3.camel@localhost>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wednesday 02 of March 2005 19:47, Matthias Muthmann wrote: > On Mi, 2005-03-02 at 10:50 +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > Aha, so at least the keys work, they are only being mapped to strange > > codes. There's one thing I've missed when trying to bring sparc related > > stuff from keyboard driver. Can you try the whole reinstall fun with > > additional patch here: > > http://www.ijs.si/~lesi/xorg/patch-bsd_KbdMap.c > > This is supposed to prevent remapping so called "internet keys" for PC > > keyboards on sparc. > > Those events above were with patches applied, right? If the above patch > > fails, could you also try getting keycodes and keysyms with plain > > xorg-server version from ports? (I don't know if I'll be able to come > > with final solution in which case this data would be valuable when > > submitting bug report to X.Org.) > > > > > > Dejan > > I just tried the server with all 3 patches applied. I didn't notice any > difference the the server with only the first two patches. > What exactly do you want me to do? Send you all the keycodes and keysyms > that outputs xev for every key? Just the ones that don't work (if they are consecutive in the row, only a range would be fine). I'm also interested in whether without these patches applied - was the row in question behaving the same as the other keys (ie codes generated being off by one) or was it behaving differently even then? Dejanhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503022010.39072.dejan.lesjak>