Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:09:55 +1100
From:      "Robert Leftwich" <freebsd@rtl.fmailbox.com>
To:        "Charles Swiger" <cswiger@mac.com>
Cc:        "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Memory leak?
Message-ID:  <1139875795.19969.254293503@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <1139875246.18972.254292031@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References:  <1139792505.30118.254198744@webmail.messagingengine.com> <43F0434F.2000703@locolomo.org> <1139826617.10634.254226042@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20060213214053.GA20537@panix.com> <1139868809.6940.254283466@webmail.messagingengine.com> <5A1E3F19-24CD-42ED-A945-A37E57EB8748@mac.com> <1139875246.18972.254292031@webmail.messagingengine.com>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail


On Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:00:46 +1100, "Robert Leftwich"
> 
> I can't see anything that explains the discrepancy. Below is the top -o
> size after a reboot, followed by the current top after 8 datasets (the
> extra python process is the analysis app - at a low memory usage point):

Oops, just noticed that the analysis app was at a *really* low memory
usage point, i.e. it wasn't running at all, having spat the dummy on
some bad data! So there wasn't any extra python app.

Robert


home | help

Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1139875795.19969.254293503>