Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Jul 1998 12:37:44 GMT
From:      jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly)
To:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: tickadj -t not changing tick 
Message-ID:  <35adf2b5.224800464@mail.cetlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <1168.900581842@critter.freebsd.dk>
References:  <1168.900581842@critter.freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Jul 1998 11:37:22 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp
<phk@critter.freebsd.dk> wrote:

>>Argh!  So should I change both kern.timecounter.frequency and the
>>machine dependent variable?  Will that work?
>
>This is why it is so much easier just to start xntpd and be done with it.
>
>They only time where you need to tweak any sysctl's is when the hardware
>is outside the capture range (+/- 128 PPM ?) of xntpd.

That's true for my hardware.

>After I implemented timecounters, time keeping doesn't depend on tick,
>and since the adjustment is for all practical purposes continuous,
>there is no benefit of tweaking the sysctls.

That sounds contradictory to the previous paragraph.  So why tweak
sysctls when it's outside the capture range of xntpd?  



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35adf2b5.224800464>