Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2004 20:18:07 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Josh Ockert <torstenvl@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd and dragonfly bsd Message-ID: <40E9B77F.18387.DA08BB23@localhost> In-Reply-To: <126eac4804070514105924929b@mail.gmail.com> References: <40E95A08.1692.D89B9D62@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5 Jul 2004 at 16:10, Josh Ockert wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 13:39:20 -0400, Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> wrote: > > On 5 Jul 2004 at 10:36, Chris Conn wrote: > > > > > Hi, I've been a FreeBSD user for a while, > > > am currently running 4.8, haven't tried > > > version 5 yet. I haven't been reading the > > > mailing lists or web sites much until now. > > > > > > I saw the web page for Dragonfly BSD and > > > it implies that there were design differences > > > with version 5 that led to this new version > > > but I don't really have a feel for what the > > > differences are, can somebody tell me about > > > this change? Or are there political issues > > > that led to this? > > > > I would think that the Dragonfly BSD lists would be the better place > > to ask about Dragonfly BSD... > I like how whenever there's a schism between two parties, it's always > the minority that is supposed to play apologetics and explain what the > differing philosophies are. That is not that was asked. We were asked to explain why Dragonfly BSD was created. Not about the FreeBSD philosophy. > IMO, someone looking to compare between two different camps is valid > in asking either or both camps about what makes them unique. Asking us about FreeBSD is quite valid. But that's not what was asked. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40E9B77F.18387.DA08BB23>