Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 19:09:58 -0400 From: Super Bisquit <superbisquit@gmail.com> To: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: i386 panic Message-ID: <CA%2BWntOtwy5f7n4zr-zuc2TRY46kKhs1p-fKgVPmYBLJPb7L8Fw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1376348547.1469.59.camel@localhost> References: <1376336582.1469.9.camel@localhost> <1376348547.1469.59.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Download the source and build the PAE kernel. Do the build world. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Sean Bruno <sean_bruno@yahoo.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 12:43 -0700, Sean Bruno wrote: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/10_i386_vmfault.txt > > > > I can never tell if stuff like this is because I'm not nerfing the > > system RAM correctly or if this is i386 bit-rot. > > > > I set hw.physmem="2g" in loader.conf to try and get the system to boot, > > but I don't think I did it right? > > > > Sean > > The 9.2RC images seem to do the same thing when nerfed to 2G of ram. > So, this doesn't appear to be a new regression. > > stable/7 seems to be happy enough to boot up PAE i386 on it, so I think > the previous suggestion of using PAE is the correct one. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BWntOtwy5f7n4zr-zuc2TRY46kKhs1p-fKgVPmYBLJPb7L8Fw>