Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:25:48 -0700
From:      Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To:        sbruno@freebsd.org
Cc:        "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: i386 panic
Message-ID:  <CAJ-VmokUOn6FvHbK5c2EBC=6TWqJmN-Ok0tweyuRW0Gp%2B2D4aA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1376368405.1474.2.camel@localhost>
References:  <1376336582.1469.9.camel@localhost> <CAEFD3DD-B324-4401-8CEA-BA3220D61C0F@samsco.org> <1376368405.1474.2.camel@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
... bug peter. And alfred. Alfred broke this stuff. :)



-adrian

On 12 August 2013 21:33, Sean Bruno <sean_bruno@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 21:36 -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>> On Aug 12, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Sean Bruno <sean_bruno@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/10_i386_vmfault.txt
>> >
>> > I can never tell if stuff like this is because I'm not nerfing the
>> > system RAM correctly or if this is i386 bit-rot.
>> >
>> > I set hw.physmem="2g" in loader.conf to try and get the system to boot,
>> > but I don't think I did it right?
>> >
>>
>> That shouldn't happen.  Maybe you've run out of kmem?  It's limited to only
>> like 400MB on i386.  Or maybe you've blown out a data structure with all
>> of those CPUs.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>
> Since we can still do this on stable/7 (gross), I kind of think this is
> a low priority regression.  Not even sure where to look, nor do I really
> want to.  :-)
>
> If someone has a clueby4 to thwack me around with, I'd appreciate it.
>
> Sean
>
> p.s. We won't be caring about this for much longer I fear over at
> $DAYJOB, so if someone wants to address this I can test it for a few
> more months.  After that, we won't care about it too much.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-VmokUOn6FvHbK5c2EBC=6TWqJmN-Ok0tweyuRW0Gp%2B2D4aA>