Date: Sun, 1 Jun 1997 18:09:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LINT and GENERIC - between a rock and a generic place. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970601180546.1534A-100000@misery.sdf.com> In-Reply-To: <1401.865208675@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Am I right in assuming that the only two items that need to be changable > > are: > > > > - max num of open files (which is based on maxusers now) > > - number of mbuf clusters (which is based on maxusers too) > > and CHILD_MAX. > > Jordan Maybe we should just have a "large" GENERIC with maxusers bumped to 128? This would give you more files, more processes, and more mbufs, which are the things that any kind of server config needs. Everything else can be done with login.conf, like news server configs, etc. My point about kernel configuration is that, everyone believes the kernel should be more dynamic, so why spend time building a config file builder? Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970601180546.1534A-100000>