Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 12:01:09 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ubldr vs ubldr.bin? Message-ID: <35BEBE2A-429E-4A56-9A01-5EBB2CF26E60@kientzle.com> In-Reply-To: <1437019414.1334.355.camel@freebsd.org> References: <op.x1tfyc2ckndu52@53555a16.cm-6-6b.dynamic.ziggo.nl> <1436978285.1334.335.camel@freebsd.org> <D31CC1FC-4D0F-456A-BBD6-BD6CEC31B2F1@kientzle.com> <1437019414.1334.355.camel@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:03 PM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-07-15 at 20:15 -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: >>> On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> >>> ubldr.bin is a raw executable image >>> (no elf headers) which is self-relocating and can be loaded at any >>> address. … a common armv6[hf] userland that runs >>> on any board. Previously the single userland difference between various >>> arm boards is that UBLDR_LOADADDR was different for each board. >> >> Wonderful! Nice work. >> >> >>> … and ubldr is still >>> being built only for compatibility with people that have older u-boot >>> installed. >> >> Hmmm…. I wonder how Crochet should handle this. Plenty of folks use Crochet to build 10-STABLE and 10.1 images, so we have to be a little careful about jumping ahead with new features that are only available in 11-CURRENT. >> >> Any plans to MFC this? >> >> Tim > > It has all been MFC'd to 10-stable around the end of May and will be in > 10.2. The only missing piece is changes to the u-boot ports. I got > started on that, got like just wandboard done (but not comitted, I'm not > actually a ports committer so I have to get someone's approval to > commit), then this crazy-deadline project came up at work. What changes are needed to the U-Boot ports? Timhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35BEBE2A-429E-4A56-9A01-5EBB2CF26E60>