Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:49:06 -0800
From:      Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com>
To:        Nick Rogers <ncrogers@gmail.com>
Cc:        jfv@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: em(4) + ALTQ broken
Message-ID:  <20100202174906.GB5901@michelle.cdnetworks.com>
In-Reply-To: <147432021002020947m40e92094o742aa854ca89bd09@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <147432021001310037n1b67f01bx4b4e8781321cea8@mail.gmail.com> <20100131224033.GA1107@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <147432021002020930y3591c278h6b07a235d3184752@mail.gmail.com> <20100202173746.GA5901@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <147432021002020947m40e92094o742aa854ca89bd09@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:47:17AM -0800, Nick Rogers wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:30:52AM -0800, Nick Rogers wrote:
> > > > I guess the problem comes from multi-queue support. The drbr
> > > > interface is implemented with inline function so em(4)/igb(4) may
> > > > have to define ALTQ to the header. I have not tested the patch(no
> > > > time at this moment) but would you give it try?
> > > >
> > > > I tried the patch and it did not work.
> >
> > You rebuilt kernel, right? Rebuilding kernel module has no effect.
> >
> Yes I rebuilt the kernel itself and replaced the one on my test system.

Hmm, I have to find time to experiment this.
Thank you for testing!



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100202174906.GB5901>