Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 01:40:15 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>, =?UTF-8?Q?Ask_Bj=c3=b8rn_Hansen?= <ask@develooper.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on 64MB memory Message-ID: <5A81DF8F.7070000@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <1518460232.94819.25.camel@freebsd.org> References: <5FB97479-C49D-4C6E-8416-015ECA656C14@develooper.com> <5A8123CE.9050609@grosbein.net> <C2042F56-2EB7-47B9-92C5-52DA21CA3132@develooper.com> <5A81D72A.7020408@grosbein.net> <1518460232.94819.25.camel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
13.02.2018 1:30, Ian Lepore wrote: >>> PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND >>> 911 root 1 22 0 8816K 8844K select 0:39 4.20% ntpd >> Your Soekris system can live without bloated ntpd, use ntpdate or try sntp >> to periodically check your clock with cron, unless you need to re-distribute >> NTP to your LAN. >> > > Heh. I think 1) you don't realize you're saying "you don't need ntpd" > to, and 2) you didn't notice the hostname of the system in some of the > debugging output (ntp1.us.grundclock.com). :) You are partialy right :-) I skipped hostname. Btw, is Soektris system has good enough hardware clock and/or enough horsepower to provide quality public NTP service? Also thinking of lots of garbage traffic these days UDP/123 suffers from...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5A81DF8F.7070000>