Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 21:44:37 +0900 (JST) From: Toshihiko ARAI <toshi@jp.FreeBSD.org> To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] pccard_ether and removable_* variables Message-ID: <200109071244.f87Cib011728.toshi@jp.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <15254.22900.863293.94059@nomad.yogotech.com> References: <15245.13394.275183.61715@nomad.yogotech.com> <200109011153.f81BrZL93078.toshi@jp.FreeBSD.org> <15253.10889.977127.513674@nomad.yogotech.com> <200109051230.f85CUGQ39840.toshi@jp.FreeBSD.org> <15254.22900.863293.94059@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
+ <15254.22900.863293.94059@nomad.yogotech.com>, Nate Williams wrote: >> You may be just right. However, 'static_routes_<interface>' is null >> and void with DHCP. Implementation of dhclient seems to surely deal >> with 'dhclient-script', but I don't so know a lot about DHCP. > True, but with DHCP, the routes are flushed automatically via the DHCP > scripts. Someone who is using DHCP to get their addresses is certainly > not going to be running as a router. I examined it. As a result, I understood that removable_route_flush was unnecessary now. When there was not dhclient with FreeBSD standard, it was necessary. I updated a patch below. Please review and test. http://home.jp.FreeBSD.org/~toshi/pccard-current-20010907.diff -- Toshihiko ARAI To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109071244.f87Cib011728.toshi>