Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Oct 2001 12:54:00 -0700
From:      "dster" <dster@syix.com>
To:        <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: 4.4-STABLE machine unusable (was Re: Openssh)
Message-ID:  <011c01c15f21$1f597380$2813933f@cat>
References:  <16946679.1004166720228.JavaMail.imail@pugsly.excite.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Right.  It turns out that Solaris has a parameter to switch path MTU
> discovery on or off ("ndd /dev/ip ip_path_mtu_discovery").  Does FreeBSD
> have anything similar?
>
> If MTU discovery fails (and AFAIK, path MTU discovery is optional with
IPv4
> anyway), then doesn't it make sense not to set the no-frag bit?   Why not
> let the router fragment those datagrams whose sizes exceed the link MTU?
> Why do we need IP fragmentation at all if not to handle cases like this
one?
>

go here

http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/

and search on mtu discovery




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?011c01c15f21$1f597380$2813933f>