Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:18:46 +0100 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 7.0, fedora-8 and "kernel: linux_sys_futex: unknown op 129" Message-ID: <20080319121846.GA34969@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <19519382@ipt.ru> References: <96317980@ipt.ru> <20080319002713.700848FC1E@mx1.freebsd.org> <20080319090956.GA21624@freebsd.org> <19519382@ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:01:13PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:09:56 +0100 Roman Divacky wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 08:27:09PM -0400, Gary Stanley wrote: > > > At 08:17 PM 3/18/2008, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > > >Hi! > > > > > > > > > > > >I see some kernel messages "kernel: linux_sys_futex: unknown op 129" > > > >when launching print/acroread7 with emulators/linux_base-f8 (soon will > > > >appear at ports) and compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16 at 7.0-RELEASE. > > > > > > > >Nothing seems to be broken but I don't like such messages. ;-) > > > > > > > >Is it hard to emplement one? Thanks! > > > > > > Try this to silence them. They appear to be harmless for now. > > > I'll commit a patch that silences this as it is really harmless... > > Yes, it will be great, thanks. > And what about implementing the unknown linux_sys_futex 128-129? Is it > hard/real? The op no 128 is used many times. Actually, linux-firefox is > cycled on op 128 and is not launched. thats FUTEX_PRIVATE_FLAG and if I understand it correctly we can just ignore this flag and pretend its just "normal" futex. I'll post a patch soon.. anyone willing to test?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080319121846.GA34969>