Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:12:38 +0200 From: Alexandre <axelbsd@ymail.com> To: "UNIX developer @ Google.com" <developerunix@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with routing in VmWare VMS Message-ID: <CA%2B8gk98PgUdwJSgDMLij3D9P5TYdwUpDDM-7FRR1S5Je0WRN%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1988813484.20120622161309@gmail.com> References: <1842148286.20120621235936@gmail.com> <op.wf9wkzvm34t2sn@tech304> <1988813484.20120622161309@gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, UNIX developer @ Google.com < developerunix@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, I understud! > I remove from rc.conf this rows: > static_routes="clnet" > route_clnet="-net 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.10" > > new rc.conf: > ifconfig_em0=" inet 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_em1=" inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" > defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" > gateway_enable="YES" > > > now after reboot the problem still the same. > > ping -S 192.168.2.1 192.168.1.1 > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) from 192.168.2.1: 56 data bytes > ^C > --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- > 8 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss > > > netstat -nr > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default 192.168.1.1 UGS 0 38 em0 > 127.0.0.1 link#4 UH 0 0 lo0 > 192.168.1.0/24 link#1 U 0 1153 em0 > 192.168.1.10 link#1 UHS 0 6 lo0 > 192.168.2.0/24 link#2 U 0 0 em1 > 192.168.2.1 link#2 UHS 0 6 lo0 > > Where more can be trouble? > > > ------------- > Вы писали 22 июня 2012 г., 0:56:49: > > > On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 15:59:36 -0500, UNIX developer @ Google.com > > <developerunix@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> /etc/rc.conf > >> ifconfig_em0=" inet 192.168.1.10 netmask 255.255.255.0" > >> ifconfig_em1=" inet 192.168.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" > >> defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" > >> gateway_enable="YES" > >> static_routes="clnet" > >> route_clnet="-net 192.168.2.0/24 192.168.1.10" > > > You simply CANNOT do this. Traffic for 192.168.2.0/24 is bound to em1 > and > > cannot be changed. You setup a static route that basically says "to find > > 192.168.2.0/24, don't use em1 but instead ask 192.168.1.10 how to find > it"? > > > This makes no sense at all. > > > -- > С уважением, > UNIX mailto:developerunix@gmail.com > Hi, Your problem, as Mark told you, is that you are buildinga gateway to connect two networks on the same subnet. Regards, Alexandrehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2B8gk98PgUdwJSgDMLij3D9P5TYdwUpDDM-7FRR1S5Je0WRN%2Bw>