Date: Tue, 5 Sep 1995 21:22:08 -0500 (CDT) From: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Cc: peter@taronga.com, terry@lambert.org, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bad superblock? Message-ID: <199509060222.VAA03427@bonkers.taronga.com> In-Reply-To: <199509060020.RAA24680@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Sep 5, 95 05:20:53 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The problem is that fsck compares the whole superblock instead of just the > areas that it cares about. Yes, that's what I was asking about. > Personally, I would recommend allowing it to do this unless you choose > to upgrade the FS to the new layout or modify the fsck, making it an > "enhanced 1.x FS" instead of a "1.x FS" or "2.x FS". Of course, I'd > advocate staying with the mainline code: update the disk or live with > the fsck. The problem is it doesn't just do an fsck. It barfs and forces a manual fsck. The automatic fsck is fine.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509060222.VAA03427>