Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 16:54:20 -0700 From: Paul Traina <pst@jnx.com> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: archie@whistle.com, julian@whistle.com, sos@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in.h ip_fw.h ip_input.c ip_output.c Message-ID: <199608222354.QAA21803@base.jnx.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 22 Aug 1996 16:48:50 PDT." <199608222348.QAA13113@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in.h ip_fw.h ip_input.c ip_output.c I like the direction that sos layed out, now it just needs to be expanded so that the pointed to object can either be in the kernel or in user land. I do too, however I think it's not agressive or generic enough in the face of the mess from the divert code. I just started hacking around on things (just scratch copies of the files), and I think we could get a very clean and general API along the way of what I discussed earlier that should handle all four functions just fine with one function call API (divert/nat/firewall/accounting). Paul
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608222354.QAA21803>