Date: Wed, 30 Apr 1997 14:06:17 +1000 From: Joel Sutton <sutton@aardvark.apana.org.au> To: Tod Luginbuhl <tod@SCIENCE-GUY.npt.nuwc.navy.mil> Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeBSD Message-ID: <199704300406.OAA04544@solsbury-hill.home> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Apr 1997 11:10:24 -0400." <199704281510.LAA12638@SCIENCE-GUY.npt.nuwc.navy.mil>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> My experience has been that FreeBSD (stable) is far more stable > than Windows 3.1 and is more stable than Win95. FreeBSD almost never > crashes at home (and it never crashes on my portable or my system at > work), where as Windows 3.1 crashed daily and it seems Win95 crashes > atleast weekly (if not more) for me on my home system (please factor > in 2 children ages 7 and 4.5 into the picture). My Win95 machine is a 386 and it crashes daily, if I'm lucky. Usually is crashes more. :-> Such is life I guess. I wanted to save my Pentium for FreeBSD... :-> Cheers, Joel...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704300406.OAA04544>