Date: Mon, 12 May 1997 11:20:48 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: perhaps@yes.no (Eivind Eklund) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, perhaps@yes.no, terry@lambert.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Regression tests (was Re: A 3.0-current SNAP building machine has been found!) Message-ID: <199705121820.LAA07885@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199705120138.DAA11210@bitbox.follo.net> from "Eivind Eklund" at May 12, 97 03:38:32 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > It sure would be. Pity it's such a hard problem to ensure that > > everything is still obeying all the right flags and still generating > > all the right output. :( > > Depends a bit on whether the design is done to make it easy to verify, > but in the general case, I agree. However, a framework and just a > regression for parts would still be an improvement. Get TET/ETET working. It's free for download. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705121820.LAA07885>