Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 10:45:48 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: "Richard Seaman, Jr." <lists@tar.com> Cc: "Jin Guojun[ITG]" <jin@george.lbl.gov>, "hardware@FreeBSD.ORG" <hardware@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Intel Pentium II released Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970524104335.14689W-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199705232122.QAA04993@ns.tar.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, 23 May 1997, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote: > On Fri, 23 May 1997 12:01:49 -0700, Jin Guojun[ITG] wrote: > > >Probably, you meant 430HX, which is one level before TX chip. It is smimilar > >to 430TX, except currency and a bit more of other features. It supposes to > >support K6. For me, I need some high performance servers, so for the same > >price, I have to get the better one. > > One disadvantage to the TX chip is that it only does L2 caching of the > first 64MB of RAM. If you have servers with large RAM levels (above 64MB) > you might not get the performance you expect. The 430HX can cache up to > 512MB. Can anyone please point me to a web page which describes all of these nuances in the the motherboard chipsets. I've looked on www.intel.com to no avail. Thanks, Dannyhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970524104335.14689W-100000>