Date: Thu, 28 Aug 1997 15:42:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM> To: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory: FreeBSD-SA-97:04.procfs Message-ID: <199708282242.PAA28726@kithrup.com> In-Reply-To: <199708282136.XAA06146.kithrup.freebsd.security@bitbox.follo.net> References: <199708261803.UAA00666@gvr.gvr.org> <19970828102957.48802@clifford.inch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <199708282136.XAA06146.kithrup.freebsd.security@bitbox.follo.net> you write: >The exploit need to be tailored for each branch. 2.1 is vulnerable. Official statement: all 4.4Lite derived systems that use procfs are vulnerable, unless Steps Have been Taken. The Steps FreeBSD Has Taken are the Steps I envisioned three or four years ago. Therefore, they are correct, and any other method is not :).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708282242.PAA28726>