Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 05:54:47 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>, FreeBSD current users <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: LFS is nuked? Message-ID: <19980131055446.35288@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <19980131121413.28219@lemis.com>; from Greg Lehey on Sat, Jan 31, 1998 at 12:14:13PM %2B1030 References: <19980130234945.43035@klemm.gtn.com> <199801310004.RAA13451@usr05.primenet.com> <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <19980131023641.18792@follo.net> <19980131121413.28219@lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 31, 1998 at 12:14:13PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 1998 at 02:36:41AM +0100, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > Hey! I'm probably going to have to either revive X.25 or drop a > > project, as TCP/IP over the ISDN D-channel is supposedly > > implemented encapsulated in X.25. > > Are you sure you're not confusing it with X.75? I'm certain *I* am not confusing it with X.75, yes. As to whether the co-worker I got the information off is confused; that is another matter. > I've never heard of X.25 being used at that level. And though X.75 > encapsulation is available for ISDN, it's by no means the preferred > method. Raw HDLC is much more efficient. The problem is that there are products (from Ascend, IIRC) that already support TCP/IP encapsulated in X.25 over the ISDN D channel. What is efficient is not too important here; what's important is that I'd like to communicate with their equipment. Eivind.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980131055446.35288>