Date: Fri, 27 Mar 1998 17:05:19 +0100 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/6124: Getting md5 to reset access times. Message-ID: <19980327170519.42224@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <199803271511.XAA14076@spinner.netplex.com.au>; from Peter Wemm on Fri, Mar 27, 1998 at 11:11:13PM %2B0800 References: <199803271055.VAA16967@godzilla.zeta.org.au> <199803271511.XAA14076@spinner.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 27, 1998 at 11:11:13PM +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > Bruce Evans wrote: > I wonder if the 'no' prefix could be used without too much drama? > ie: mount -u -o noasync /home vs. mount -u -o async /home. > Of course, the problem is when the option has a built-in 'no' prefix > already.. nonoatime anyone? :-) (not that this is hard to work around, > just it's a potential source of mistakes..) atime. It is just happens to be a default option; I can't see that it should be a large problem to implement it separately (but I haven't looked at the 'mount' source). Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980327170519.42224>