Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 23:18:03 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fix for undefined "__error" and discussion of shared object versioning Message-ID: <19980527231803.18654@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <199805272107.OAA03993@rah.star-gate.com>; from Amancio Hasty on Wed, May 27, 1998 at 02:07:55PM -0700 References: <19980527225223.43868@follo.net> <199805272107.OAA03993@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 27, 1998 at 02:07:55PM -0700, Amancio Hasty wrote: > Next, is can you come up with a simple benchmark to test the floating > point optimization for Pentium classes or higher? Not easily, no. Robert Nordier had som FP code he was compiling with it. I have no floating point intensive code, and I run on an atypical platform (the Pentium Pro, which has a quite different profile than the Pentium. The P-II is supposedly like the Pentium). >From looking at the optimizations passes I can say that it should be at least as fast as gcc for 386, 486, and Pentium Pros, faster for Pentiums, and I don't know for P-IIs - I have never really experimented to find the performance profile for the P-IIs. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980527231803.18654>