Date: Thu, 11 Jun 1998 10:57:30 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, shmit@kublai.com Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 440BX based SMP systems Message-ID: <19980611105730.A13809@klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <199806110529.WAA01089@antipodes.cdrom.com>; from Mike Smith on Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 10:29:09PM -0700 References: <19980610021229.57129@kublai.com> <199806110529.WAA01089@antipodes.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 10, 1998 at 10:29:09PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > > What ever happened to timing Linux kernel builds under FreeBSD? I > > still have a couple of clueless 31337 Linux weens here at work and > > I'd love to be able to tell them to use FreeBSD to compile their > > kernels. :-) > > Nobody supplied a ready-to-build Linux kernel tree for evaluation... Would be an unicum for the Ports Collection ;-) Should it be called linux-kernel or vmlinuz ? ;-)) -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980611105730.A13809>