Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1998 10:28:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: ben@rosengart.com, archie@whistle.com, sthaug@nethelp.no, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should FreeBSD-3.0 ship with RFC 1644 (T/TCP) turned off by Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980905102431.6991D-100000@shell.uniserve.ca> In-Reply-To: <199809050757.AAA00885@usr08.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 5 Sep 1998, Terry Lambert wrote: > The problem is not the options, per se, but the fact that some > systems failed to mplement correct option negotiation, per > RFC 793, for previously non-existant options. > > Livingston Portmasters were one known offender. ... > Thus you would actualy puke bad equipment into non-operability. ... Ugh... really? I use Livingston Portmaster's and FreeBSD heavily. Be aware that (depending on the model) Portmasters have had a long history, and some sites are still running 4 year old firmware on them. Always get the ComOS version. > Terry Lambert > terry@lambert.org > --- > Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present > or previous employers. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980905102431.6991D-100000>