Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:37:35 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Christopher Petrilli <petrilli@amber.org> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au Subject: Re: VPN for FreeBSD 2.2.8 and 3.2 Message-ID: <199908231837.MAA40646@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 22 Aug 1999 23:43:51 EDT." <19990822234351.D18458@amber.org> References: <19990822234351.D18458@amber.org> <19990822231452.A18458@amber.org> <199908230336.NAA21519@cheops.anu.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19990822234351.D18458@amber.org> Christopher Petrilli writes: : Is this flamebait really necessary? FreeBSD is hardly insecure, and for : 99.999999% of the situations, set up by a knowledgable administrator, is : every bit as secure as OpenBSD, or anything else. In the extreme edge cases, as well as for bundled crypto OpenBSD has a slight edge here. FreeBSD is certainly secure enough for most people's needs, and getting more so all the time. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908231837.MAA40646>