Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 23:25:58 -0300 From: Marcelo Gondim <gondim@bsdinfo.com.br> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.3 - Intel X520-SR2 stops passing packets Message-ID: <55691FB6.5090307@bsdinfo.com.br> In-Reply-To: <1FB15FA4-6185-4206-9517-AE9667A1A57C@gmail.com> References: <C8B78CF4-184C-4BFE-B848-37A91A3B696B@gmail.com> <5560C395.8020807@farrokhi.net> <5564852D.8040008@bsdinfo.com.br> <1FB15FA4-6185-4206-9517-AE9667A1A57C@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28-05-2015 11:14, Guy Helmer wrote: >> On May 26, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Marcelo Gondim <gondim@bsdinfo.com.br> wrote: >> >> On 23-05-2015 15:14, Babak Farrokhi wrote: >>> Look at the interrupts per queue. 500,000 is the maximum and it is the >>> reason your interface is not accepting new packets. >>> >>>> Guy Helmer <mailto:guy.helmer@gmail.com> >>>> May 21, 2015 at 6:03 PM >>>> I’ve noticed that there have been reports of problems with Intel >>>> X520-SR2 network interfaces stopping working. I think I’m seeing a >>>> similar issue where the 10Gb interfaces stop receiving traffic >>>> (they’re being used in promiscuous mode to sniff traffic from a tap). >>>> ifconfig shows the interfaces are still active and the links are OK. >>>> ifconfig down/up restores activity. I’ve changed >>>> hw.intr_storm_threshold=8000 but I couldn’t tell if the interrupt >>>> storm threshold had been triggered at the time the interfaces stopped >>>> passing traffic. >>>> >>>> Output from sysctl: >>>> >>>> . . . >> Hi, >> >> I had this problem and one day updated the system 10.1- RELEASE to 10.1- STABLE and the problem stopped. I was one years with this problem and a script running and testing the interface when the interface stopped working I was doing exactly what you did. Today I no longer have that problem anymore. >> >> I'm using 10.1-STABLE r281235 > > Thanks for the indication of success with 10.1-STABLE. I am locked into using FreeBSD 9.x until I can go through the whole integration and acceptance testing cycle for 10.x, so I’m trying to find a solution that works on in 9.x. I have reviewed the diffs between 9.3 and 10.1-STABLE for ixgbe driver and haven’t noticed anything that stands out. > Guy, I may be wrong but I think the change was not the ixgbe driver.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55691FB6.5090307>