Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 20:34:16 -0500 (CDT) From: Bob Friesenhahn <bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us> To: "Davide D'Amico" <davide.damico@contactlab.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreBSD 9.1 and ZFS v28 performances Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.2.01.1303192031480.11141@freddy.simplesystems.org> In-Reply-To: <1bfdea0efb95a7e06554dadf703d58e7@sys.tomatointeractive.it> References: <514729BD.2000608@contactlab.com> <810E5C08C2D149DBAC94E30678234995@multiplay.co.uk> <51473D1D.3050306@contactlab.com> <1DD6360145924BE0ABF2D0979287F5F4@multiplay.co.uk> <51474F2F.5040003@contactlab.com> <E106A7DB08744581A08C610BD8A86560@multiplay.co.uk> <51475267.1050204@contactlab.com> <514757DD.9030705@contactlab.com> <42B9D942BA134E16AFDDB564858CA007@multiplay.co.uk> <1bfdea0efb95a7e06554dadf703d58e7@sys.tomatointeractive.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Davide D'Amico wrote: >> >> While running the tests what sort of thing are you >> seeing from gstat, any disks maxing? If so primarily >> read or write? > Here the r/w pattern using zpool iostat 2: Using 'zpool iostat 2' is not likely to be very useful since zfs writes all of is data in bursts and may wait up to 5 seconds to do so. If your benchmark uses synchronous writes and does continous updates, then you should see zfs writing continiously to your zil device (or the pool). Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.GSO.2.01.1303192031480.11141>