Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:02:34 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: jasone@canonware.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC: buildworld breakage due to cross-tools/libc/mktemp. Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000119235909.5750A-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <200001200454.XAA05264@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> What we had before the _libc_XXX name additions would have worked > as long as all internal uses of XXX inside libc were changed to > _XXX, and, when building for libc_r, all renamed (hidden) system > calls need _XXX defined as weak symbols to _thread_sys_XXX. Actually, you don't even need to define _XXX as a weak symbol for _thread_sys_XXX when building libc_r. libc_r will provide the routine _XXX to perform the call conversion, so defining _XXX as a weak symbol is not needed. Dan Eischen eischen@vigrid.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.1000119235909.5750A-100000>