Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2000 15:30:23 +0900 From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org> To: will@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/gtkicq Makefile ports/net/gtkicq/files md5 ports/net/gtkicq/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST Message-ID: <8666ttds00.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Fri, 7 Apr 2000 22:43:38 -0700 (PDT)" <200004080543.WAA37614@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200004080543.WAA37614@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Fri, 7 Apr 2000 22:43:38 -0700 (PDT),
Will Andrews <will@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> will 2000/04/07 22:43:38 PDT
>
> Removed files:
> net/gtkicq Makefile
> net/gtkicq/files md5
> net/gtkicq/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST
> Log:
> Remove gtkicq files as I mistakenly imported them when gnome-icu is its
> successor. *sigh*
Hey, let me tell some history.
When GnomeICU succeeded GtkICQ, GnomeICU just worked without GNOME
envionment. But during the update process it had dropped support for
non-GNOME environment and came to work only with GNOME, while GtkICQ
had also been maintained independently.
That's the reason we have both of the ports in Japanese category
though GtkICQ isn't maintained enough. Some may want to keep using
GtkICQ just because they don't want GNOME.
So, you didn't have to remove the GtkICQ port, I suppose. But if you
think GtkICQ is obsolete and you recommend kicq or whatever instead
for non-GNOME environment, I won't stand against it.
Just FYI.
I've been using GnomeICU, by the way. (#1684809)
--
/
/__ __
/ ) ) ) ) /
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( <knu@idaemons.org>
"If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8666ttds00.wl>