Date: Mon, 01 May 2000 19:36:39 +0100 (BST) From: Joao Pedras <jpedras@webvolution.net> To: Lowell Gilbert <lowell@world.std.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rsh's -t feature Message-ID: <XFMail.000501193639.jpedras@webvolution.net> In-Reply-To: <200005011832.OAA24173@world.std.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
]:)
why do we need to make things so difficult ?
tkx
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> I wanted to shutdown a couple machines with a command issued from a third
> which
> is 'directly' connected to the ups.
> Sure. That case is easy, especially if they're directly connected to
> each other. ping a machine, and only try to rsh to it if it responds...
^\ /^
O O
----------------------------------------o00-(_)-00o--------------------------
Rule of the Great:
When people you greatly admire appear to be thinking deep
thoughts, they probably are thinking about lunch.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
PGP key available upon request or may be cut at
http://pedras.webvolution.net/pgpkey.html
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.000501193639.jpedras>