Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 19 Jul 2000 11:21:58 -0700
From:      R Joseph Wright <rjoseph@mammalia.org>
To:        Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Color ls
Message-ID:  <20000719112158.A13347@manatee.mammalia.org>
In-Reply-To: <20000719150836.K630@pavilion.net>; from joe@pavilion.net on Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 03:08:36PM %2B0100
References:  <20000718140646.B76011@lunatic.oneinsane.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007181416130.20886-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000718145920.B94689@wopr.caltech.edu> <20000719005555.W4668@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> <20000718170420.A97601@wopr.caltech.edu> <20000718175525.A10074@manatee.mammalia.org> <20000719150836.K630@pavilion.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 03:08:36PM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 05:55:25PM -0700, R Joseph Wright wrote:
> > 
> > The thing that really bugs me about ls is the lack of bright colors like you
> > get with gnuls.  The blue is so dark it blends in with the black background
> > of the console.  I spent several hours looking through the code to see if I
> > could change that, but alas I did not understand it :-(.
> > And, sorry to rant, but the default colors are horrid, too!  Do 'ls -G /dev'
> > to see what I mean.  AAaaarh!
> > 
> 
> Colours are always a personal preference.  No answer is right for everyone.
> Read the manual page for ls and define your own colours in your environment.
> 
Absolutely.  That's why I said (hopefully in good humor) the *default* colors
are horrid.  However, you can change the defaults all you want, but you still 
will not get bright color like you get with gnuls.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000719112158.A13347>