Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Aug 2000 11:53:04 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Jan Conrad <conrad@th.physik.uni-bonn.de>
To:        "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 3.5-STABLE and posix4/semaphore.h?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008071149230.24242-100000@merlin.th.physik.uni-bonn.de>
In-Reply-To: <200008070023.RAA04410@freeway.dcfinc.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 6 Aug 2000, Chad R. Larson wrote:

> As I recall, Jan Conrad wrote:
> > sorry for asking, but is it correct that semaphore calls like sem_destroy,
> > even though defined in semaphore.h, are not implemented under 3.5-STABLE?
> 
> It is if you don't have
> 
>     options  SYSVSEM
> 
> in the config file you used to build your kernel.

well - I *have* that option set, but as far as I understand things this
enables sysV semaphores but not those of posix4...

when I do

	grep -R sem_destroy /usr/src/sys

I get

/usr/src/sys/posix4/semaphore.h:int sem_destroy __P((sem_t *));

as the only answer!
> 
> > thanks for your help
> 
> De nada.
> 
> 	-crl

regards
	Jan




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0008071149230.24242-100000>