Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 16:31:11 -0700 From: Jim Mock <jim@FreeBSD.org> To: Nik Clayton <nik@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Mark Ovens <marko@FreeBSD.ORG>, David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>, doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Porters handbook missing for docs webpage Message-ID: <20000813163111.B516@luna.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: <20000813211222.D4052@kilt.nothing-going-on.org>; from nik@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 09:12:22PM %2B0000 References: <20000809035116.A986@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000809123016.A251@parish> <20000813211222.D4052@kilt.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 at 21:12:22 +0000, Nik Clayton wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:30:16PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: > > My feeling is that the Porters & Developers Handbooks, and the FDP > > & PPP Primers should be classified as "books" and should appear as > > such the generated docs and as such should have a "top-level" link > > from http://www.freebsd.org/docs.html rather than from the tutorials > > section. > > I knew I'd forgotten something in my other messages. > > My preferred approach to this is to set up docs.freebsd.org, probably > modeled along very similar lines to docs.sun.com. We can then set up > the links within docs.freebsd.org along much more logical and simple > lines than the mess of links, redirects, and Makefile kludges that > sit in the current web site. Woo hoo! :-) > This is probably simpler than trying to iteratively improve the > situation in www/. > > Volunteers wanted. What do you have in mind? - jim -- jim mock <jim@jmock.com> work: jim@osd.bsdi.com | jim@FreeBSD.org http://soupnazi.org/ BSDi Open Source Div | http://bsdi.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000813163111.B516>