Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 21:23:15 +0100 From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> To: Mark Ovens <marko@freebsd.org> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netcraft 'serve-ey' Message-ID: <20000913212314.F97742@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20000913202642.G264@parish>; from marko@freebsd.org on Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:26:42PM %2B0100 References: <20000913200807.E97742@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20000913202642.G264@parish>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:26:42PM +0100, Mark Ovens wrote: | On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:08:07PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote: | > | > Does anyone know if the netcraft survey is accurate? I recently read | > a comment that alleged it was not, and that (surprise) NT and | > Solaris were the dominant server OSs. | > | | See http://www.netcraft.com/os/accuracy.html for an explanation. One | reason is that what Netcraft's probes see is the firewall in front of | the web server, or a load balancer. So can we lend any credence to the claims of any of the manufacturers of servers that they are dominant in the field? BTW: the source was entmag.com, i forget the article name, but it was easy to find. jcm -- "I drank WHAT ?!" - Socrates To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000913212314.F97742>