Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 09:45:37 -0400 From: Josh Tiefenbach <josh@zipperup.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: Idea Receiver <receiver@RedDust.BlueSky.net.au>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: strange problem of PPPoE + NAT Message-ID: <20001026094537.A75049@zipperup.org> In-Reply-To: <200010260655.XAA12955@usr08.primenet.com>; from tlambert@primenet.com on Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 06:55:14AM %2B0000 References: <20001025195050.A44709@zipperup.org> <200010260655.XAA12955@usr08.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> BTW: I believe PPPoE in both Julian and Archie's cases specifically > uses the netgraph PPP implementation, so it's an "all in the > kernel" approach; the problem may be your use of user space code > (i.e. killable code, since you can't kill it in the kernel, only > unlink or unload it). Actually, I dont believe so. At least, ppp(8) merely uses the PPPoE netgraph node, and does all PPP processing in user space, AFAICT. If, however, you're referring to mpd, then yes, that uses the netgraph PPP implementation. > Terry Lambert josh -- "Watching those 2 guys [Bush and Gore] debate is like watching Ben Stein read 'The Story of O'" -- Dennis Miller To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001026094537.A75049>