Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Nov 2000 01:02:31 -0600 (CST)
From:      Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: SunOS (was: Linux vs. FreeBsd (reposted))
Message-ID:  <14883.22663.798406.35937@guru.mired.org>
In-Reply-To: <20001128162028.L36542@echunga.lemis.com>
References:  <105953745@toto.iv> <14883.13084.936215.485266@guru.mired.org> <20001128153136.F36542@echunga.lemis.com> <14883.18053.897935.589671@guru.mired.org> <20001128162028.L36542@echunga.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> types:
> > Other companies that went through the BSD->SysV transition changed the
> > name of the OS: Ultrix turned into OSF (among other things), 
> Well, OSF definitely wasn't System V.  Quite the contrary.

True. OSF required a System III license, and tried to be all things to
all people. It did strange things like making "ps <flags>" use BSD
flags, but "ps -<flags>" use SysV flags. DEC went from there to DEC
Unix (whatever that is), but they *changed the name* when the Unix
they started from became radically different. Which is what Sun failed
to do.

	<mike
--
Mike Meyer					http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Unix/FreeBSD consultant,	email for rates.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14883.22663.798406.35937>