Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 09:07:52 -0500 (EST) From: Francisco Reyes <fran@reyes.somos.net> To: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> Cc: Francisco Reyes <lists@reyes.somos.net>, FreeBSD Chat List <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: ECC worth the extra cost for SOHO server? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101070905290.5014-100000@zoraida.reyes.somos.net> In-Reply-To: <200101070506.f0756as07326@grumpy.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001, David Kelly wrote: > Unless a memory chip fails catastrophically, its hard to find the errant > chip. When they go bad they usually start logging an ECC correction > every day or two. Where does that get reported? As I understand ECC is handled by the motherboard. > As for MBs? The new VIA KT133 does *not* do ECC (Asus A7V) but am told > the older KX133 does. Do you know by any chance which motherboards use the old KX133? Doesn't this affect sales of Athlon CPUs for servers? After all that has been historically the market for ECC. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0101070905290.5014-100000>