Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 16:40:16 +0200 From: Eugene Polovnikov <paranoid@brain-fag.org> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nos-tun & multihomed machines Message-ID: <20010316164016.A52749@zssm.zp.ua> In-Reply-To: <20010316143910.B90057@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 02:39:10PM %2B0200 References: <20010316112914.A50671@zssm.zp.ua> <20010316105026.A12010@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20010316124046.D67000@sunbay.com> <20010316125806.J12010@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20010316143910.B90057@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >> > > >Except that it does not allow to use proto 94 (the default for nos-tun). > > > > I'm sure we can work something out with the KAME guys over this, if it > > is necessary to keep this in. *chalks up another task* > > > It should be pretty easy to add the ``int gif_pproto'' member to the > gif_softc structure, and expand gif_ioctl() interface to handle smth > like SIOC[SG]IFPPROTO (where PPROTO stands for "physical protocol"). At least it's need to add some mechanism for dynamic changing of inetsw. Something like that must exist in netgraph, IIRC. And I agree that when all nos-tun's functions be implemented nos-tun must go away. But can anyone say when ? -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCS/CC/IT d-@ s: a- C++ UBSC++++$ P++>+++@ L- E--- W+ N++ o? K? w>-- O- M- V- PS@ PE@ Y+ PGP>+ t 5 X R tv- b+++(++++) DI-- D+(++) G>++ e- h--- r y+++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010316164016.A52749>