Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 22:52:01 +0100 From: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> To: doc@FreeBSD.org, Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Translators: Need feedback on FAQ reorganization Message-ID: <20010404225200.A94400@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <20010404220539.H46362@nathan.ruhr.de>; from ue@nathan.ruhr.de on Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:05:39PM %2B0200 References: <20010314131233.C6138@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010314210730.J83336@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010315023806.B46684@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010315200337.N83336@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010315210350.A1113@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010316104207.H24155@django.de.uu.net> <20010316190808.A389@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010326054147.D31676@nathan.ruhr.de> <20010404143938.A6408@canyon.nothing-going-on.org> <20010404220539.H46362@nathan.ruhr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:05:39PM +0200, Udo Erdelhoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 02:39:39PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
> > What collateral damage? It's a 50 line diff, of which only 22 lines are
> > actual changes. Clearly I'm misunderstanding something about the
> > processes you're using if that's causing problems.
>=20
> and all the neccessary changes in the framework introduced in that versio=
n.
> The most visible sign of the collateral was the "Fix build of German FAQ"
> commit Alex did a few days ago.
Are we talking about the same file? From what I can see, the German FAQ
hasn't synced up with 1.555 of the English FAQ yet. As to the changes,=20
the only stuff out of the ordinary that I added was the bookinfo entity=20
reference, and the bookinfo.legalnotice; usage. But those have have been=
=20
in the German CVS tree since the 9th June last year.
Can you explain in more detail what the problem is, and what you had to
do to work around it?
N
PS: On the offchance that you're talking about the citerefentry stuff,=20
(which wasn't in 1.555 of the FAQ) I was under the impression that=20
that generated a diagnostic message only, and didn't otherwise
impact the output. Was that wrong?
--=20
FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.freebsd.org/
FreeBSD Documentation Project http://www.freebsd.org/docproj/
--- 15B8 3FFC DDB4 34B0 AA5F 94B7 93A8 0764 2C37 E375 ---
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjrLl4AACgkQk6gHZCw343Xm/wCeIDbR+Bzmc3vkLuaFZLkIZTzX
ndIAn0tstvsqkf58cB00LTtgWQoRv540
=Fj1A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010404225200.A94400>