Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Nov 2002 13:32:53 -0800 (PST)
From:      Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To:        Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: [brooks@one-eyed-alien.net: [PATCH] switching to if_xname]
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211231332421.77310-100000@root.org>
In-Reply-To: <20021123125056.A10727@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 02:15:34PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:54:23AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to get some review for the following patch.  I realize it's
> > > > quite large, but most it is is trivial.  The ipfw code is the only thing
> > > > that worries me significantly.  I have promised Kris that I will fix
> > > > ports that break with this change so you don't need to worry about that
> > > > issue.
> > > 
> > > I've uploaded a new version of the patch addressing the concerns I've
> > > heard to:
> > > 
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~brooks/patches/if_xname.diff
> > 
> > Thanks for fixing things.  Are all the uses of sprintf() below safe and
> > intentional?
> 
> No, they weren't intentional.  I managed to forget to scan for those.
> Most of them were safe, but I've removed all of them.  (Grep still hits
> a few due to ipf using sprintf).  I've uploaded a new version.  I'm now
> testing a world build on panther.

Looks good to me now.

-Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0211231332421.77310-100000>