Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 03:32:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Source of cvs commit Message-ID: <20030512032720.L22964@znfgre.qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <20030512101947.GA41228@submonkey.net> References: <9256D57F598E6C41B288AA7DB94F29C9B1E0C2@pgnmail1.pgnaplikace.cz> <20030512101947.GA41228@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Ceri Davies wrote: > > - if yes, why not to add line reffering directly to web-cvs so I can just > > cut/paste it to my favourite browser? > > It looks really confusing when lots of files have been changed in the same > commit. If you want this locally, then check out the cvsmail port. I have two slightly different answers to that question. First, I think that the historical weight against "perversion" of e-mail with things like URL's is really more to blame. Yes, on those rare commits that touch a lot of files you end up with a lot of links in the e-mail. So what? :) Second, I have a procmail recipe that not only inserts cvsweb URL's into commit mail, it also creates links for PR's if present. You can get it at http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/ Enjoy, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030512032720.L22964>