Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 17:19:39 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Is this correct? Message-ID: <20030520171939.16786c3c.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030520212200.GA91809@submonkey.net> References: <20030520212200.GA91809@submonkey.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 May 2003 22:22:00 +0100 Ceri Davies <setantae@submonkey.net> wrote: > > I'm pretty sure that this patch is correct, but not 100%. Comments? > > Ceri > -- > > Index: sgml-markup/chapter.sgml > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/dcvs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/sgml-markup/chapter.sgml,v > retrieving revision 1.54 > diff -u -r1.54 chapter.sgml > --- sgml-markup/chapter.sgml 20 May 2003 21:18:38 -0000 1.54 > +++ sgml-markup/chapter.sgml 20 May 2003 21:20:33 -0000 > @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ > > <para>Some elements may exist in two forms, <emphasis>formal</emphasis> > and <emphasis>informal</emphasis>. Typically, the formal version of > - the element will consist of a title followed by the information > + the element will consist of a title followed by the informal > version of the element. The informal version will not have a > title.</para> > </note> > This, looks correct. Mainly the fact that the next line talks about the 'informal version'. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030520171939.16786c3c.trhodes>