Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:51:24 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: internal/staff.sgml Message-ID: <20030930165124.2d93dcf3.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20030930204315.GA388@FreeBSD.org> References: <20030929105114.5d39d879.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030929190404.GL915@submonkey.net> <20030929151550.3fe57a38.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <20030930204315.GA388@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 22:43:17 +0200 "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2003.09.29 15:15:50 -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > [More observant readers will note that I'm not proposing anything better; > > > I'm just voicing a concern. Don't let that stop you ;-) ] > > > > Yes, I did notice that. :) > > > > While I did draft a patch up for this, I can revert all that work if > > a more novel idea came about. This is why I asked for comments before > > committing anything. :) > > Since nobody seems to have a real good idea for doing this, I really > think internal/staff.sgml is the best way forward at the moment. Thank you. > > I think it is much more important to get all the information up-to-date > and gathered at one place, compared to getting it "right". If somebody > comes up with a great way; well, that is what CVS is for :). We can actually get it "right" later. Or move it elsewhere later, for now I think having all the data in one place and duplication removed from others will do the trick. I'll let this ride for awhile longer, then I'll commit my WIP. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030930165124.2d93dcf3.trhodes>