Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2003 11:18:38 +0300 From: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> Cc: fenner@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I would like to tcpdump and get all the packets... Message-ID: <3F7BDF5E.9060704@he.iki.fi> In-Reply-To: <20031002001920.GF660@saboteur.dek.spc.org> References: <20030917182850.Q52432-100000@mail.econolodgetulsa.com> <20030918014203.GA59403@k7.mavetju> <3F694D56.9040609@he.iki.fi> <20030918124311.GC3431@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <3F6A1CA9.5030701@he.iki.fi> <20030918210538.GB2720@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <3F6A2710.5090000@he.iki.fi> <20031001171158.GK13612@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <3F7B20E5.6010301@he.iki.fi> <20031002001920.GF660@saboteur.dek.spc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce M Simpson wrote: >ports would seem to be an acceptable halfway house, though, for people who >want to use pcap/tcpdump of a more recent vintage, than has been determined >to be suitable for a FreeBSD release. does it not? > > On general case, I agree with you. However libpcap does not change that often, tcpdump changes somewhat more often but the major issue here is that pcap is in direct conflict of FreeBSD release kernel code by breaking the bpf_bufsize and bpf_maxbufsize tunables from functioning. Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F7BDF5E.9060704>