Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 08:18:33 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Roderick van Domburg <r.s.a.vandomburg@student.utwente.nl> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reasons for 64-bTT & DHCP import Message-ID: <20040315161833.GA10855@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <200403151528.i2FFSe602853@netlx014.civ.utwente.nl> References: <20040314210709.GA6482@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <200403151528.i2FFSe602853@netlx014.civ.utwente.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 04:28:42PM +0100, Roderick van Domburg wrote: > > > > Also, I am curious why we're not importing ISC DHCP 3 in the base > > > system. Skimming over the ISC license, I don't see any direct issues. > > > Once again: don't mean to bash, just curious. > > > > Someone has to feel the need. If it's the maintainer who feels the need, > > you don't anything else. Otherwise you need enough voices to make the > > maintainer feel the need to do it. Sometimes there are good reasons to > > not upgrade. I don't know if that applies here. I don't think so. > > You don't feel there are any reasons not to or you don't feel there are any > reasons? :-) I don't think there are specific reasons not to upgrade. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040315161833.GA10855>