Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 14:54:05 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Dills <andy@xecu.net> To: Odhiambo Washington <wash@wananchi.com> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tpop3d experience ? Message-ID: <20040324145054.K23306@thunder.xecu.net> In-Reply-To: <20040322142823.GA32786@ns2.wananchi.com> References: <20040321202625.GR7109@complx.LF.net> <20040322142823.GA32786@ns2.wananchi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > * Kurt Jaeger <lists@complx.LF.net> [20040321 23:26]: wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'm researching other POP server options besides qpopper > > on servers with many (6K+) and sometimes large (200MB+) pop boxes > > in maildir configuration. > > > > Is someone using tpop3d ? Care to share your experience ? > > I have over 10k user accounts from /etc/passwd (system users, > without shells) and over 4k users from MySQL. > I run tpop3d-1.5.3 (actually I've been running it since those > early days of 1.3.x) and I must say I am very happy with it. > Before that, I did run other pop3 daemons but they lacked the > flexibility I wanted. This is an ISP enviroment, using Maildir > for both system accounts and DB based users. > > With tpop3d, you can't go wrong! For what it's worth, qmail's pop3d is also pretty solid. Very small, very lightweight, and you get to write your own password authentication if you want. For an MTA however, I don't use qmail, I use postfix (but with maildir). Although, this thread has convinced me to try out tpop3d...I'll definitely give it a look. Andy --- Andy Dills Xecunet, Inc. www.xecu.net 301-682-9972 ---
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040324145054.K23306>